Cases for Creativity 2016 Campaigns Drop by Two

The Gunn Report has released Cases for Creativity 2016, which features 15 combined Gold Lion and Gold Effie winning campaigns.

The Gunn Report has released Cases for Creativity 2016, a round-up of the campaigns that have achieved the highest accolade in advertising by winning a Cannes Gold Lion for creativity and Gold Effie for effectiveness. The annual study is produced by James Hurman (pictured), author and founder of innovation consultancy, Previously Unavailable.

Representing the ultimate industry achievement, 15 campaigns accomplished such a feat in 2016.  Six of the fifteen cases are for commercial brands. The others are not-for-profit or corporate social responsibility campaigns. The Cases for Creativity from 2016 are:

  1. #whoistheking for Burger King by Buzzman, France
  2. Breast Cream for New Zealand Breast Cancer Foundation by Colenso BBDO, New Zealand
  3. Groceries Not Guns for Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America by Grey Toronto, Canada
  4. Last Words for Indian Association of Palliative Care by Medulla Communications, India
  5. Lifepaint for Volvo by Grey London, United Kingdom
  6. Manboobs for MACMA by David Buenos Aires, Argentina
  7. Multiple campaigns for John Lewis by adam&eveDDB, United Kingdom
  8. Multiple campaigns for Old Spice by Wieden+Kennedy Portland, USA
  9. Radiometries, for Exito Foundation by Sancho BBDO, Colombia
  10. Save our Songbirds for Natura 2000 NGO Coalition by Jazz, Romania
  11. Share the Load for Ariel by BBDO Mumbai, India
  12. The 6-Pack Band for Brooke Bond Red Label by Mindshare Mumbai, India
  13. The Bulletpen for Ministry of National Education by McCann Bogotá, Colombia
  14. The Madden Giferator for EA Sports by Heat, USA
  15. World Gallery for Apple by TBWA\Media Arts Lab Los Angeles, USA

“Two of this year’s group are retrospective effectiveness awards, acknowledging the success, over many years, of Old Spice and John Lewis. These feel like proper creative advertising. Campaigns that have taken two brands that by rights should have been as dull as dishwater, and made them transcend their natural order. Made leaders of them,” said James Hurman, Author of Cases for Creativity.

“But looking at the other, more recent campaigns, I worry that we’re losing the ability to do that. We’re in danger of becoming overly seduced by anything that’s trying to save the world. And our commercial campaigns look less like efforts to make brands transcendent and more like attempts to follow a fashion of being so real and authentic that we actually kind of avoid creativity,” he added.

“Whilst these campaigns can be disarming to the consumer, I’m not sure it’s really creative. Most troubling, these campaigns all feel just a bit too similar. Like we’ve stopped awarding work that’s different, and started awarding work that’s the same. As the gold Effies prove, these campaigns are effective, but we musn’t lose the ability to set brands apart with big shiny ideas as we are in danger of losing the magic that creative agencies can add to brands.”

The number of Cases for Creativity in 2016 dropped by two compared to 2015 (17). In 2014 and 2013, there were 12 apiece and in 2012, when the first study launched, there were only nine. To view The Gunn Report’s Cases for Creativity 2016 study in full, click here.